PUBLICATIONS

                                                                Essays

1. Appeal before the Supreme Criminal Court against a decision and suspension of its enforcement, Αrmenopoulos 1994, p. 744.

2. The legal character of extraterritoriality, Yperaspisi 1994, p. 969 επ.

3. Apology of the accused outside the district of the investigating magistrate and hearing from the prosecutor prior to taking procedural coercive measures, Ε.ΝΟ.ΒΕ., v. 25, Sakkoula editions, 1995, p.p. 239.

4. Preventive physical investigations, the principle of necessity and the protection of human dignity, Yperaspisi 1995, p. 1237 επ.

5. The review of the duration of temporary detention pursuant to Laws 2207/1994 and 2298/1995, Yperaspisi 1996, p. 161 επ.

6. The Article 161 CCP, Yperaspisi 1997, p. 1359 επ.

7. Participation in crime and appeal, Yperaspisi, 1997, p. 795.

8. Restrictive terms and teen accused, Yperaspisi 1998, p. 1329.

9. Late appeal and force majeure at the end of the time limit, Yperaspisi 1999, p. 751.

10. The civil action in the crime of the recommendation to commit the culpable crime of murder, Νοmiko Vima 1999, p. 1104. 

11. The irrevocability of the judgment as a condition for the formation of a total penalty under Article 551 of the CCP, Yperaspisi 2000, p. 397. 

12. The provisional detention of the accused as a condition of the admissibility of his removal or replacement, Υperaspisi 2000, p. 1125.

13. The detention of the appellant as a condition of appeal and the principle of proportionality, in: Poiniki Dikaiosyni, 2002, p. 926-935.

14. The procedural provisions of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, in: Ι. Μanoledakis - C. Prittwitz, Internationalization of criminal law, Sakkoula editions, 2003, p. 161. 

15. The procedural provisions of the Law 3346/2005, Poiniki Dikaiosini 2005, p. 195.

16. European Court of Human Rights: Proportionality and Fair Trial" in: Poinika Chronika 2005, p.p. 873-881 .

17. - Protection of witnesses during the prosecution of organized crime, in: Essays in Honour of I. Manoledakis, vol. II, 2007, p.p. 767-776. 

18. The parallel importation of the civil claims in criminal and civil proceedings, in: Essays in Honour of A. Psarouda-Benaki, 2008, p.p. 841-853.

19. The mention of the status of the attorney-at-law (465 (2) of the CCP) in the report on the appeal, Poinika Chronika 2010, p. 169.

20. - "The referral of the accused in a court by an irrevocable decree of the Council Appeals", in: Essays in Honour of A. Karras, 2010, p.p. 463-475.

21. Procedural discrepancies in the area of economic crimes and corruption in the public sector, in: «Financial crime and corruption in the public sector», P.N. Sakkoula editions - Athens 2014, p.p. 863-969.

22. The procedural arrangements in the plan for financial crime and corruption in the public sector, in : «Financial crime and corruption in the public sector», vol. 3, P.N. Sakkoula editions - Athens 2015, p.p. 623-636 και 665-667.

23. Issues of application of Law 4022/2011, in: Essays in Honour of Christoforos Argiropoulos, 2016, p. 1001.

24. Aspects of the violation of the right of defense in criminal proceedings, Armenopoulos 2017, p. 518.

Comments on judicial decisions

1. Comment on PlimPeir 833/1992, Υper. 1993, p. 363.

2. Comment on PlimThess 115/1993, Yper. 1993, p. 653.

3. Comment on PlimThess 101/1993, Yper. 1993, p. 954.

4. Comment on PlimLar Ε93/58/1993, Yper. 1993, p. 1200.

5. Comment on PlimGiann 30/1993, Yper. 1993, p. 1342.

6. Comment on PlimThess 8066/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 131.

7. Comment on PlimIoan 149/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 136.

8. Comment on PlimThess 4244/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 345.

9. Comment on EfPatr 2089/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 621.

10. Comment on PlimThess 851/1992, Υper. 1994, p. 624.

11. Comment on PlimThess 3347/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 892.

12. Comment on ΑP 355/1994, Υper. 1994, p. 1032.

13. Comment on EfAth 3279/1993, Yper. 1994, p. 1055.

14. Comment on EfPatr 97/1994, Υper. 1994, p. 1095.

15. Comment on EfThess 393/1993, Υper. 1994, p. 1390.

16. Comment on EfThess 377/1994, Υper. 1994, p. 1398.

17. Comment on PlimThess 750/1994, Υper. 1994, p. 1413.

18. Comment on EfAth 1324/1993, Υper. 1995, p. 65.

19. Comment on PlimAth 3934/1993, Υper. 1995, p. 126.

20. Comment on EfPatr 19/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 170.

21. Comment on ΑP 1322/1994, Υper, 1995, p. 268.

22. Comment on PlimThess 446/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 342.

23. Comment on PlimVolou 1611/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 533.

24. Comment on PlimThess 16808/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 537.

25. Comment on AP 1209/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 707.

26. Comment on ΑP 1791/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 715.

27. Comment on ΑP 1824/1994, Υper. 1995, p. 720.

28. Comment on ΑP 108/1995, Υper. 1995, p. 935.

29. Comment on ΑP 604/1995, Υper. 1995, p. 970.

30. Comment on AP 703/1995, Υper. 1995, p. 974.

31. Comment on ΑP 723/1995, Υper. 1995, p. 980.

32. Comment on EfThess 520/1995, Υper. 1995, p. 1141.

33. Comment on ΑP 614/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 30.

34. Comment on ΑP 953/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 37.

35. Comment on ΑP 1375/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 296.

36. Comment on ΑP 1683/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 528.

37. Comment on ΑP 1684/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 533.

38. Comment on ΑP 1611/1995, Υper. 1996, p. 796.

39. Comment on ΑP 218/1996, Υper. 1996, p. 812.

40. Comment on ΑP 143/1996, Υper. 1996, p. 969.

41. Comment on ΑP 507/1996, Υper. 1996, p. 986.

42. Comment on AP 233/1996, Υper. 1996, p. 1277.

43. Comment on ΑP 144/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 43.

44. Comment on AP 907/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 56.

45. Comment on ΑP 928/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 58.

46. Comment on EfPatr 292/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 340.

47. Comment on ΑP 1100/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 556.

48. Comment on ΑP 1129/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 562.

49. Comment on AP 1610/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 585.

50. Comment on ΑP 9/1997, Υper. 1997, p. 588.

51. Comment on AP 1507/1996, Υper. 1997, p. 822.

52. Comment on EfPeir 7/1997, Υper. 1997, p. 904.

53. Comment on ΑP 51/1997, Υper 1997, p. 1008.

54. Comment on ΑΠ 60/1997, Υper. 1997, p. 1010.

55. Comment on ΑP 67/1997, Υper. 1997, p. 1013.

56. Comment on ΑP 1285/1997, Yper. 1998, p. 67.

57. Comment on ΑP 1272/1997, Υper. 1998, p. 532.

58. Comment on ΑP 1383/1997, Υper. 1998, p. 545.

59. Comment on ΑP 1423/1997, Υper. 1998, p. 555.

60. Comment on ΑP 1527/1997, Υper. 1998, p. 558.

61. Comment on ΑP 595/1998, Υper. 1998, p. 1089.

62. Comment on PlimThess 38559/1998, Υper. 1998, p. 1124.

63. Comment on ΑP 773/1998, Υper. 1999, p. 60.

64. Comment on ΑP 1061/1998, Υper. 1999, p. 63.

65. Comment on ΑP 1437/1998, Υper. 1999, p. 324.

66. Comment on ΑP 1512/1998, Υper. 1999, p. 343.

67. Comment on ΑP 1367/1998, Υper. 1999, p. 919.

68. Comment on ΑP 119/1999, Υper. 1999, p. 929.

69. Comment on ΑP 159/1999, Υper. 1999, p. 935.

70. Comment on PlimThess 794/1999, Υper. 1999, p. 1434.

71. Comment on ΑP 457/1999, Υper. 2000, p. 280.

72. Comment on ΑP 1576/1999, Υper. 2000, p. 812.

73. Comment on ΑP 206/2000, Υper. 2000, p. 1000.

74. Comment on ΑP 232/2000, Υper. 2000, p. 1002.

75. Comment on ΑP 761/2000, Υper. 2000, p. 1013.

76. Comment on ΕfThess 954/2000, Υper. 2000, p. 1029.

77. Comment on ΑP 738/1999, Yper. 2000, p. 1181.

78. Comment on ΑP 5/2000, Αrm. 2001, p. 109.

79. Comment on EfThess 342/2000, Αrm 2001, p. 111.

80. Comment on EfThess 814/2000, Αrm. 2001, p. 113.

81. Comment on EfThess 1507/1999, Αrm. 2001, p. 118.

82. Comment on EfThess 3259/2000, Αrm. 2001, p. 250.

83. Comment on EfThess 20/2000, Αrm. 2001, p. 392.

84. Comment on PlimTrik 4/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 395.

85. Comment on PlimKast 2/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 705.

86. Comment on ΑP 341/2001, PoinDik 2001, p. 508.

87. Comment on PlimArtas 39/2001, PoinDik 2001, p. 595.

88. Comment on ΑP 1271/2000, Αrm. 2001, p. 971.

89. Comment on EfPeir 125/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 977.

90. Comment on PlimThess 443/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 1110.

91. Comment on EfThess 531/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 1254.

92. Comment (practical application of Criminal Law), PoinDik 2001, p. 852.

93. Comment on PlimKozan 867/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 1408.

94. Comment on ΑP 869/2001, PoinDik 2001, p. 1007.

95. Comment on EfThess 1116/2001, Αrm. 2001, p. 1553.

96. Comment on ΑP 986/2001, PoinDik 2001, p. 1128.

97. Comment on ΑP 735/2001, Αrm. 2002, p. 95.

98. Comment on ΑP 13/2001, Αrm. 2002, p. 284.

99. Comment on OlomAP ΑΠ 2/2002, Αrm. 2002, p. 439.

100. Comment on ΑP 1088/2001, Αrm. 2002, p. 441.

101. Comment on ΕfThess 1029/2001, Αrm. 2002, p. 766.

102. Comment on PlimAmf 161/2001, PoinDik 2002, p. 532.

103. Comment on EfThess 4440/2002, Αrm. 2002, p. 1221.

104. Comment on ΑP 412/2002, Αrm. 2002, p. 1361.

105. Comment on EfAth 1402/2001, Αrm. 2002, p. 1507.

106. Comment on ECHR, Sajtos v. Greece, 21.03.2002, no 53478/99, PoinDik 2002, p. 1038.

107. Comment on ΑP 1451/2002, Αrm. 2002, p. 1661.

108. Comment on EfThess 1670/2002, Αrm. 2002, p. 1846.

109. Comment on ΑP 1979/2002, Αrm. 2003, p. 405.

110. Comment on PlimThess 531/2002, Αrm. 2003, p. 709.

111. Comment on EfThess 249/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 862.

112. Comment on ΑP 602/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 1172.

113. Comment on ΑP 979/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 1174.

114. Comment on ΑP 1691/2002, Αrm. 2003, p. 1329.

115. Comment on ΑP 263/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 1331.

116. Comment on EfAeg 20/2002, Αrm. 2003, p. 1337.

117. Comment on EfThess 2/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 1485.

118. Comment on ΑP 1320/2003, Αrm. 2003, p. 1663.

119. Comment on ΕCHR, Skondrianos v. Creece, 18.12.2003, nos 63000/00 et 74291/01 et 74292/01), PoinDik 2004, p. 43.

120. Comment on ΑP 1604/2003, Αrm. 2004, p. 126.

121.Comment on PlimThess 21876/2003, Αrm. 2004, p. 415.

122. Comment on ΑP 2415/2003, PoinDik 2004, p. 402.

123. Comment on ΑP 2556/2003, Αrm. 2004, p. 587.

124. Comment on ΑP 2345/2003, PoinDik 2004, p. 673.

125. Comment on ECHR, Boulougouras v. Greece, 27.05.2004, nο 66294/2001, PoinDik 2004, p. 960.

126. Comment on ΑP 541/2004, Αrm. 2004, p. 1321.

127. Comment on ΑP 1097/2004, Αrm. 2004, p. 1459.

128. Comment on ΑP 344/2004, Αrm. 2004, p. 1733.

129. Comment on AP 1140/2004, Αrm. 2005, p. 88.

130. Comment on ΑP 1371/2004, Αrm. 2005, p. 282.

131. Comment on ΑP 812/2005, Αrm. 2005, p. 1102.

132. Comment on Olom.AP 6/2005, PoinDik 2005, p. 806.

133. Comment on ΑP 24/2005, Αrm. 2005, p. 1293.

134. Comment on ΑP 1685/2004, Αrm. 2005, p. 1448.

135. Comment on ΑP 1707/2005, Αrm. 2005, p. 1632.

136. Comment on ΑP 298/2005, Αrm. 2005, p. 1800.

137. Comment on ΑP 2341/2005, Αrm. 2005, p. 2024.

138. Comment on EfThess 1/2006, Αrm. 2006, p. 918.

139. Comment on ΑP 1162/2006, PoinDik 2006, p. 852.

140. Comment on ΑP 577/2006, Αrm. 2006, p. 1091.

141. Comment on ΑP 1359/2006, Αrm. 2006, p. 1618.

142. Comment on ΑP 1059/2007, Αrm. 2007, p. 1386.

143. Comment on ΑP 1139/2007, Αrm. 2007, p. 1389.

144. Comment on ΑP 1969/2007, Αrm. 2008, p. 122.

145. Comment on ΑP 1483/2007, Αrm. 2008, p. 284.

146. Comment on ΑP 1592/2007, Αrm. 2008, p. 457.

147. Comment on Olom.AP 4/2008, Poinika Chronika 2008, p. 692.

148. Comment on ΑP 1509/2008, PoinDik 2008, p. 849.

149. Comment on ΑP 1497/2008, Αrm. 2008, p. 1229.

150. Comment on ΑP 1460/2008, Αrm. 2008, p. 1392.

151. Comment on Olom.AP 4/2009, Αrm. 2010, p. 546.

152. Comment on ΑP 804/2011, Αrm. 2011, p. 1542.

153. Comment on ΑP 160/2011, Αrm. 2011, p. 2000.

154. Comment on ΑP 1193/2014, Αrm. 2015, p. 290. 

155. Comment on ΑP 337/2016, Αrm. 2016, p. 675.

156. Comment on EfPeir 80/2015, Αrm. 2016, p. 877.

157. Comment on ΑP 873/2016, Αrm. 2016, p. 858.

158. Comment on ΑP 781/2016, Αrm. 2016, p. 1061.

159. Comment on Olom.AP 3/2016, Αrm. 2016, p. 1934.

160. Comment on ΑP 1928/2016, Αrm. 2017, p. 110.

161. Comment on ΑP 500/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 819.

162. Comment on ΑP 511/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 822.

163. Comment on ΑP 1115/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1021.

164. Comment on ΑP 791/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1212.

165. Comment on ΑP 1157/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1216.

166. Comment on ΑP 733/2016, Αrm 2017, p. 1406.

167. Comment on AP 1197/2016, Αrm. 2017, p. 1411.

168. Comment on ΑP 1227/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1568.

169. Comment on EfPatr 11/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1574.

170. Comment on ΑP 442/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 1962.

171. Comment on ΑP 511/2017, Αrm. 2017, p. 2142.

172. Comment on ΑP 101/2018, PoinDik 2018, p. 409.